Sunday, February 15, 2026
  • English
  • Marathi
No Result
View All Result
Daily PRABHAT
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • National
  • International
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Technology
    • Science
Daily PRABHAT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • National
  • International
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
Home National

Justice Narasimha recuses from hearing plea of Meru Cabs as he appeared for Uber India

by
4 years ago
in National
A A
Justice Narasimha recuses from hearing plea of Meru Cabs as he appeared for Uber India
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

New Delhi [India], April 29 (ANI): Justice PS Narasimha, the Supreme Court judge on Friday recused from hearing a plea filed by Meru Cabs because earlier he had appeared as a lawyer for Uber India in another case.

A Bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and Narasimha agreed to list the matter on May 9 before a Bench of which Justice Narasimha is not a member.

When the matter came up for hearing today, senior advocate P Chidambaram, appearing for Meru Cabs, told the Bench that Justice Narasimha had appeared for Uber before while adding that he has no objection to the Bench hearing the matter but said that it was his duty to point out this fact.

Justice Narasimha thanked Chidambaram for bringing this aspect to his notice and refused from hearing the case. Justice Rao said that if the Advocate on Record had circulated a letter stating this fact, the Bench would not have spent about an hour’s time studying the files yesterday.

Meru Cabs had approached the top court challenging the order of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) which dismissed its complaint alleging abuse of dominant position by Uber India.

In 2015 Meru Cabs approached the Competition Commission of India and on July 14, 2021, the CCI declined to intervene in the matter while observing that the facts and evidence on record do not establish the dominance of Uber.

The CCI had said that it does not find merit in the argument of Meru Cabs that incentives and rating the mechanism adopted by Uber for its driving partners had any Appreciable Adverse Effect on Competition (AAEC) in the market.

The National Company Appellate Tribunal on January 7, 2022, approved the CCI’s order by dismissing Meru’s appeal against it. Later, Meru Cabs approached the top court. (ANI)

ShareTweetSendShareSend

Latest News

Digital Lok Adalat app launched to tackle massive 2.5 crores traffic challans

NDMC Vice Chairperson reviews AI Summit preparations to align with PM Modi’s vision

PM Modi hails Union Cabinet’s major decisions on railways, roads, infrastructure and connectivity

Gujarat gets 6th Vande Bharat Ahmedabad-Udaipur service, to be inaugrated on Feb 16

News must be presented with honesty, integrity in digital era: Tripura CM Saha at Bi-Annual State Conference

Himchal Governor, CM greet people on the eve of Shivratri

Cabinet approves rehabilitation, upgradation and widening of several National Highways

PM Modi targets Congress in poll-bound Assam; accuses it of appeasement politics, says it “never prioritized” nation’s security

Gujarat CM Bhupendra Patel releases ‘Mari Rashtraprathamni Kalpana’

Matter of immense pride that Northeast has got Emergency Landing Facility, says PM Modi; unveils projects worth over Rs 5,450 crore in Guwahati

New Delhi [India], April 29 (ANI): Justice PS Narasimha, the Supreme Court judge on Friday recused from hearing a plea filed by Meru Cabs because earlier he had appeared as a lawyer for Uber India in another case.

A Bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and Narasimha agreed to list the matter on May 9 before a Bench of which Justice Narasimha is not a member.

When the matter came up for hearing today, senior advocate P Chidambaram, appearing for Meru Cabs, told the Bench that Justice Narasimha had appeared for Uber before while adding that he has no objection to the Bench hearing the matter but said that it was his duty to point out this fact.

Justice Narasimha thanked Chidambaram for bringing this aspect to his notice and refused from hearing the case. Justice Rao said that if the Advocate on Record had circulated a letter stating this fact, the Bench would not have spent about an hour's time studying the files yesterday.

Meru Cabs had approached the top court challenging the order of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) which dismissed its complaint alleging abuse of dominant position by Uber India.

In 2015 Meru Cabs approached the Competition Commission of India and on July 14, 2021, the CCI declined to intervene in the matter while observing that the facts and evidence on record do not establish the dominance of Uber.

The CCI had said that it does not find merit in the argument of Meru Cabs that incentives and rating the mechanism adopted by Uber for its driving partners had any Appreciable Adverse Effect on Competition (AAEC) in the market.

The National Company Appellate Tribunal on January 7, 2022, approved the CCI's order by dismissing Meru's appeal against it. Later, Meru Cabs approached the top court. (ANI)

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • National
  • International
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Technology
    • Science