Thursday, March 30, 2023
  • English
  • Marathi
No Result
View All Result
Daily PRABHAT
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • National
  • International
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Technology
    • Science
Daily PRABHAT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • National
  • International
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
Home National

Justice Narasimha recuses from hearing plea of Meru Cabs as he appeared for Uber India

by
11 months ago
in National
A A
Justice Narasimha recuses from hearing plea of Meru Cabs as he appeared for Uber India
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

New Delhi [India], April 29 (ANI): Justice PS Narasimha, the Supreme Court judge on Friday recused from hearing a plea filed by Meru Cabs because earlier he had appeared as a lawyer for Uber India in another case.

A Bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and Narasimha agreed to list the matter on May 9 before a Bench of which Justice Narasimha is not a member.

When the matter came up for hearing today, senior advocate P Chidambaram, appearing for Meru Cabs, told the Bench that Justice Narasimha had appeared for Uber before while adding that he has no objection to the Bench hearing the matter but said that it was his duty to point out this fact.

Justice Narasimha thanked Chidambaram for bringing this aspect to his notice and refused from hearing the case. Justice Rao said that if the Advocate on Record had circulated a letter stating this fact, the Bench would not have spent about an hour’s time studying the files yesterday.

Meru Cabs had approached the top court challenging the order of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) which dismissed its complaint alleging abuse of dominant position by Uber India.

In 2015 Meru Cabs approached the Competition Commission of India and on July 14, 2021, the CCI declined to intervene in the matter while observing that the facts and evidence on record do not establish the dominance of Uber.

The CCI had said that it does not find merit in the argument of Meru Cabs that incentives and rating the mechanism adopted by Uber for its driving partners had any Appreciable Adverse Effect on Competition (AAEC) in the market.

The National Company Appellate Tribunal on January 7, 2022, approved the CCI’s order by dismissing Meru’s appeal against it. Later, Meru Cabs approached the top court. (ANI)

ShareTweetSendShareSend

Latest News

“CBI, ED brought all corrupt people to one party”: Kejriwal

Mumbai: Singer arrested for molesting college girl at Borivali railway station

India’s first national wheelchair tennis tournament being organised in Indore

IITRDF, GIC Re sign MoU for development of Semi-Transparent Perovskite Solar Cells

Siliguri eyes tourism boost from G20 meeting from April 1

“Salary of ASHA workers to increase from Rs 6000 to Rs 10,000”, Puducherry CM N Rangasamy

“We will appeal in sessions court”: Congress leader Salman Khurshid on Rahul Gandhi’s disqualification

Mizoram: Assam Rifles, Customs recover 235 cases of foreign cigarettes worth Rs 3.525 crore

SSP Bathinda meets Giani Harpreet Singh at Takht Sri Damdama Sahib Gurudwara

DCW issues notice to Delhi Police, IP college principal on reports of sexual harassment with girls during college fest

New Delhi [India], April 29 (ANI): Justice PS Narasimha, the Supreme Court judge on Friday recused from hearing a plea filed by Meru Cabs because earlier he had appeared as a lawyer for Uber India in another case.

A Bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and Narasimha agreed to list the matter on May 9 before a Bench of which Justice Narasimha is not a member.

When the matter came up for hearing today, senior advocate P Chidambaram, appearing for Meru Cabs, told the Bench that Justice Narasimha had appeared for Uber before while adding that he has no objection to the Bench hearing the matter but said that it was his duty to point out this fact.

Justice Narasimha thanked Chidambaram for bringing this aspect to his notice and refused from hearing the case. Justice Rao said that if the Advocate on Record had circulated a letter stating this fact, the Bench would not have spent about an hour's time studying the files yesterday.

Meru Cabs had approached the top court challenging the order of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) which dismissed its complaint alleging abuse of dominant position by Uber India.

In 2015 Meru Cabs approached the Competition Commission of India and on July 14, 2021, the CCI declined to intervene in the matter while observing that the facts and evidence on record do not establish the dominance of Uber.

The CCI had said that it does not find merit in the argument of Meru Cabs that incentives and rating the mechanism adopted by Uber for its driving partners had any Appreciable Adverse Effect on Competition (AAEC) in the market.

The National Company Appellate Tribunal on January 7, 2022, approved the CCI's order by dismissing Meru's appeal against it. Later, Meru Cabs approached the top court. (ANI)

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • National
  • International
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Technology
    • Science