Tuesday, June 16, 2026
  • English
  • Marathi
No Result
View All Result
Daily PRABHAT
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • National
  • International
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Technology
    • Science
Daily PRABHAT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • National
  • International
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
Home National

‘No comments’: Sidhu after receiving one-year jail term in road rage case

by
4 years ago
in National
A A
‘No comments’: Sidhu after receiving one-year jail term in road rage case
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Chandigarh [India], May 19 (ANI): Congress leader Navjot Singh Sindhu refused to comment after being sentenced to one-year rigorous imprisonment in a three-decade-old road rage case by the Supreme Court of India on Thursday.

“No comments,” Sidhu told reporters on being asked about the one-year imprisonment.

The apex court on Thursday allowed the review application on the issue of sentence against Sidhu, saying, “We have allowed review application on the issue of sentence. In addition to the fine imposed, we impose a sentence of imprisonment of one year to be undergone by respondent Sidhu.”

The order was delivered by a bench of justices AM Khanwilkar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul.

Earlier, the court had reserved the review petition in a three-decade-old road rage case filed by the family of the victim.

On December 27, 1988, Sidhu allegedly beat Gurnam Singh on his head, leading to his death.

Sidhu opposed the plea seeking to enlarge the scope of the road rage case against him citing earlier order of the apex court which held that there was no evidence that the death of the victim was caused by a single blow in the road rage case.

Sidhu’s submission came while replying to an application filed by family members of the victim seeking to enlarge the scope of notice in the review petition in a three-decade-old road rage case against him.

Sidhu, responding to the application filed by the petitioner seeking to enlarge the scope of notice, submitted that the application was devoid of any merits and ought to be dismissed.

Sidhu was acquitted in connection with the culpable homicide charges but was convicted of the offence of voluntarily causing hurt. The court had slapped a fine of Rs 1,000 on Sidhu. The court had also acquitted Sidhu’s associate, Rupinder Singh Sandhu, in the case.

The case has gone through Session Court, High court, and Supreme Court.

The Sessions Court Judge of Patiala had on September 22, 1999, acquitted Sidhu and his associate, due to a lack of evidence in the case and giving the benefit of the doubt.

It was then challenged by the victim’s families before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had in 2006, convicted and sentenced Sidhu to three years imprisonment. Sidhu then filed an appeal before the apex court challenging this order. (ANI)

ShareTweetSendShareSend

Latest News

Trinamool youth leader Soumitra Banerjee attacked with eggs while being taken to court

Bhopal Court extends judicial custody of Twisha Sharma’s husband, mother-in-law till June 30

“Surprising we are not more outspoken”: Priyanka Gandhi attacks Centre over death of 3 Indian sailors

Strong arm of law will act when required: NTA DG defends temporary ban on telegram, flags foreign fake leak channels

“Safe migration and elimination of child labour” is a humanitarian responsibility: Gujarat Minister Kunvarjibhai Bavaliya

Telangana: Man killed by uncle in Mahabubabad district; probe underway

Security tightened in Pahalgam, Anantnag ahead of Amarnath Yatra 2026

Air India Express commences daily direct flights connecting Pune and Amritsar

Karnataka Lokayukta conducts simultaneous state-wide raids over disproportionate wealth

AIADMK suffers another setback as C Vijayabaskar resigns as MLA

Chandigarh [India], May 19 (ANI): Congress leader Navjot Singh Sindhu refused to comment after being sentenced to one-year rigorous imprisonment in a three-decade-old road rage case by the Supreme Court of India on Thursday.

"No comments," Sidhu told reporters on being asked about the one-year imprisonment.

The apex court on Thursday allowed the review application on the issue of sentence against Sidhu, saying, "We have allowed review application on the issue of sentence. In addition to the fine imposed, we impose a sentence of imprisonment of one year to be undergone by respondent Sidhu."

The order was delivered by a bench of justices AM Khanwilkar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul.

Earlier, the court had reserved the review petition in a three-decade-old road rage case filed by the family of the victim.

On December 27, 1988, Sidhu allegedly beat Gurnam Singh on his head, leading to his death.

Sidhu opposed the plea seeking to enlarge the scope of the road rage case against him citing earlier order of the apex court which held that there was no evidence that the death of the victim was caused by a single blow in the road rage case.

Sidhu's submission came while replying to an application filed by family members of the victim seeking to enlarge the scope of notice in the review petition in a three-decade-old road rage case against him.

Sidhu, responding to the application filed by the petitioner seeking to enlarge the scope of notice, submitted that the application was devoid of any merits and ought to be dismissed.

Sidhu was acquitted in connection with the culpable homicide charges but was convicted of the offence of voluntarily causing hurt. The court had slapped a fine of Rs 1,000 on Sidhu. The court had also acquitted Sidhu's associate, Rupinder Singh Sandhu, in the case.

The case has gone through Session Court, High court, and Supreme Court.

The Sessions Court Judge of Patiala had on September 22, 1999, acquitted Sidhu and his associate, due to a lack of evidence in the case and giving the benefit of the doubt.

It was then challenged by the victim's families before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had in 2006, convicted and sentenced Sidhu to three years imprisonment. Sidhu then filed an appeal before the apex court challenging this order. (ANI)

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • National
  • International
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Technology
    • Science