Sunday, May 17, 2026
  • English
  • Marathi
No Result
View All Result
Daily PRABHAT
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • National
  • International
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Technology
    • Science
Daily PRABHAT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • National
  • International
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
Home National

Economic criteria alone doesn’t justify extra relaxations in Central Govt jobs, says Delhi HC

by Digital Desk
4 weeks ago
in National
A A
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Delhi High Court (Photo/ANI)

New Delhi [India], April 17 (ANI): The Delhi High Court has refused to grant relief to candidates from the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) seeking relaxation in the upper age limit and number of attempts for Central government jobs, holding that such matters fall within the realm of government policy.

The Court observed on Thursday that the existing framework, which provides 10 per cent reservation to EWS candidates without extending additional relaxations, does not violate any constitutional provisions. It emphasised that courts cannot interfere with policy decisions merely because a more equitable alternative may exist, unless the policy is shown to be arbitrary or unconstitutional.

The bench noted that EWS constitutes a distinct category based solely on economic disadvantage, unlike the Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST) and Other Backwards Classes (OBC) categories which are rooted in historical and social backwardness. In view of this distinction, the Court held that EWS candidates cannot claim parity with these categories in matters of age relaxation or number of attempts as a matter of right.

Dealing with the argument of discrimination, the Court observed that economic hardship is not static and may change over time, whereas caste-based disadvantages are deep-rooted and enduring. Therefore, differential treatment in granting relaxations does not amount to a violation of equality under the Constitution.

The Court further noted that decisions relating to the grant of relaxations involve multiple considerations, including administrative feasibility, available data, and resource constraints, which fall within the exclusive domain of the Executive. It also clarified that policies adopted by certain States granting such relaxations to EWS candidates do not bind the Central Government.

Finding no merit in the plea, the Court dismissed the petition and declined to issue any directions to alter the existing policy. (ANI)

ShareTweetSendShareSend

Latest News

“Matter of great fortune”: Kumar Vishwas on Bhojshala case verdict

Jitendra Singh lauds of Sree Chitra Tirunal’s contribution towards indigenous medical device development

Haryana receives Geospatial Excellence Award in Netherlands, Chief Minister congratulates HARSAC team

Court denies bail to DGCA Deputy DG after noting investigation at sensitive stage in corruption case

“Nowhere is it stated that Namaz should be discontinued”: Mosque Society chief Abdul Samad says Bhojshala verdict “blatantly one-sided”

Nitish Kumar chose Samrat Choudhary as his successor to carry forward his legacy: Union Minister Lalan Singh

India, Netherlands to deepen cooperation in green hydrogen, semiconductors, water sector: MEA

Swedish industry leaders laud growing India ties ahead of PM Modi’s Sweden visit

Canadian HC to India holds talks on defence cooperation with Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh

Maharashtra: 8 Maoists arrested, 5 senior cadres surrender before Gadchiroli Police and CRPF

The Delhi High Court (Photo/ANI)

New Delhi [India], April 17 (ANI): The Delhi High Court has refused to grant relief to candidates from the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) seeking relaxation in the upper age limit and number of attempts for Central government jobs, holding that such matters fall within the realm of government policy.

The Court observed on Thursday that the existing framework, which provides 10 per cent reservation to EWS candidates without extending additional relaxations, does not violate any constitutional provisions. It emphasised that courts cannot interfere with policy decisions merely because a more equitable alternative may exist, unless the policy is shown to be arbitrary or unconstitutional.

The bench noted that EWS constitutes a distinct category based solely on economic disadvantage, unlike the Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST) and Other Backwards Classes (OBC) categories which are rooted in historical and social backwardness. In view of this distinction, the Court held that EWS candidates cannot claim parity with these categories in matters of age relaxation or number of attempts as a matter of right.

Dealing with the argument of discrimination, the Court observed that economic hardship is not static and may change over time, whereas caste-based disadvantages are deep-rooted and enduring. Therefore, differential treatment in granting relaxations does not amount to a violation of equality under the Constitution.

The Court further noted that decisions relating to the grant of relaxations involve multiple considerations, including administrative feasibility, available data, and resource constraints, which fall within the exclusive domain of the Executive. It also clarified that policies adopted by certain States granting such relaxations to EWS candidates do not bind the Central Government.

Finding no merit in the plea, the Court dismissed the petition and declined to issue any directions to alter the existing policy. (ANI)

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • National
  • International
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Technology
    • Science